History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Hobbs
14 A.D.2d 926
N.Y. App. Div.
1961
Check Treatment

The defendant urges that at the time of the 1930 conviction he was not represented by counsel, nor was he advised of his right to counsel. Defendant made a previous coram nobis application in February, 1954, before the same court, based on the identical grounds. At that time the court took proof and conducted a full hearing concerning defendant’s arraignment and Sentencing with respect to the 1930 conviction. After such hearing the court denied his coram ndbis application by an order dated May 18, 1954. No effective appeal was taken from such order. Where a second or later application is made, and where upon such application the defendant fails to allege any new or additional facts, with the result that the later application is in all material respects the same as the prior application, there is no reason why a hearing must be conducted on the later application (People v. Sullivan, 4 N Y 2d 472; People v. Merritte, 11 A D 2d 628). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hobbs
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 27, 1961
Citation: 14 A.D.2d 926
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.