People v. HinesPeople v. Hines
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant executed a written waiver of his right to appeal. The waiver of the right to appeal encompassed any claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Blair, 26 AD3d 513 [2006]), as well as any claim that the defendant was entitled to youthful offender treatment (see People v Friedlander, 11 AD3d 556 [2004]).
The defendant‘s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Mastro, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.