History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Hillmon
1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12822
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1989
|
Check Treatment

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to make a motion pursuant to CPL 330.30, defendant has failed to preserve for review his argument that the court’s verdict, following a bench trial, is repugnant (People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987; People v Baldwin, 130 AD2d 666, 667-668). We decline to reach this issue in the interest of justice. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — burglary, third degree; criminal mischief, fourth degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hillmon
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 6, 1989
Citation: 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12822
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.