People v. HiggsPeople v. Higgs
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his right to appeal as part of his plea agreement (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]). The defendant executed a detailed written waiver of the right to appeal from the judgment of conviction which included “any suppression issues that may exist . . . pre-trial motions or rulings by the Court” (People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; see People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829, 830 [1975], cert denied 423 US 873 [1975]; People v Holman, 33 AD3d 815 [2006]; People v Burke, 25 AD3d 722 [2006]). Thus, review of his challenge to the County Court‘s suppression determination is foreclosed by this waiver. Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher, Lifson and Dickerson, JJ., concur.