People v. HicksPeople v. Hicks
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted conspiracy in the second degree (
Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court improperly delegated its duty to conduct the plea allocution to defense counsel (see People v Swontek [appeal No. 1], 289 AD2d 989, 989 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 762 [2002]). In any event, that contention and defendant‘s related contention that his right to counsel was violated are without merit (see People v Rossborough, 105 AD3d 1332, 1334 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1045 [2013]). Finally, the waiver of the right to appeal encompasses defendant‘s contention that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.