THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v GAREN A. FISHER, Appellant.
[989 NYS2d 311]
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant‘s challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; People v Terry, 115 AD3d 683, 684 [2014]). Moreover, contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the exception to the preservation requirement does not apply here because the defendant‘s allocution did not cast significant doubt on his guilt, negate an essential element of the crime, or call into question the voluntariness of his plea (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d at 666; People v Wilson, 111 AD3d 969, 970 [2013]; People v Coats, 195 AD2d 519 [1993]). In any event, the facts admitted by the defendant during his plea allocution were sufficient to support his plea of guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (see
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Dillon, J.P., Hall, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
