History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Hedges
184 A.D. 901
N.Y. App. Div.
1918
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs. The defendant paid the principal and withheld the interest incident to it, while the law demanded him to pay. The withholding was not an inadvertence, but an unlawful insistence of ownership. It does not require a demand to convert a rightful possession into a wrongful holding, when a public officer, in breach of the demand which the statute* puts upon him, keeps and retains as his own the funds of a town. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concurred.

See Town Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 62; Laws of 1909, chap. 63), § 91, as amd. by Laws of 1909, chap. 491.— [Rep.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hedges
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1918
Citation: 184 A.D. 901
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.