It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant was convicted upon her plea of guilty of forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.10 [1]) and now challenges the amount of restitution ordered by County Court. The record establishes that a hearing to determine the amount of restitution was conducted by a referee and that, when the People asked the court to order the amount recommended in the Referee‘s report, defendant did not object to the amount. We thus conclude that defendant‘s present challenge to the amount of restitution ordered is not properly before us (seePeople v Melino, 16 AD3d 908, 911 [2005], lv denied5 NY3d 791 [2005]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Kehoe, Gorski, Green and Pine, JJ.