History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Hawes
41 Cal. 632
Cal.
1871
Check Treatment
By the Court, Wallace, J.:

The appeal is from the judgment, and rests upon the judgment roll, being in this case the pleadings, findings, and judgment—no bill of exceptions or statement appearing in the record. A stipulation is found embodied in the transcript, from which it would appear that for the purpose of a trial in the Court below and an appeal to this Court, if one should be thereafter taken, certain isolated facts were agreed upon" (not, however, mating up the case to be determined), and *634also agreeing that certain evidence might be offered on the trial, subject to objection, etc. This stipulation is not, by statute, part of the judgment roll. It is not an exception under section one hundred and eighty-eight, nor a statement on appeal under section three hundred and thirty-eight, and we cannot therefore consider it or the points of the appellant, depending, as they do, wholly upon it.

The judgment is therefore affirmed, as of the 10th day of January, 1871.

Mr. Justice Crockett did not participate in the foregoing decision.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hawes
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1871
Citation: 41 Cal. 632
Docket Number: No. 2,204
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.