People v. HarrisonPeople v. Harrison
Contrary to defendant‘s argument, we do not find the resentence to be harsh or excessive. Despite being afforded several opportunities to succeed on probation, defendant was unable to abide by the conditions of his supervision or stay out of trouble with the authorities. On this record, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the resentence in the interest of justice (see People v Kornell, 85 AD3d 1449, 1449-1450 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 860 [2011]; People v Tyler, 76 AD3d 1144 [2010]).
Mercure, A.P.J., Peters, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.