Judgment unanimously reversed as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and new trial granted. Memorandum: The issue of when an objection pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (
In the present case, defendant presented a prima facie claim of discrimination (Batson v Kentucky,
We exercise our discretion in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6]) and reach defendant’s valid Batson claim. The Trial Judge is now deceased, some four years have elapsed since the trial, and there is no indication that the circumstances surrounding the exercise of the peremptory challenges can be reconstructed. Under the circumstances, remittal for a hearing would be inappropriate (see, People v Scott, supra).
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and a new trial granted. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Kennedy, J. — robbery, third degree; criminal mischief, fourth degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
