midpage

People v. HardeePeople v. Hardee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 3, 2011
Versions:84 A.D.3d 835
922 N.Y.S.2d 785

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant‘s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution (see People v Brown, 78 AD3d 723 [2010]; People v Johnson, 73 AD3d 951 [2010]).

Since the defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea, his current contention that the plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v LeGrady, 50 AD3d 1059, 1060 [2008]). In any event, the record reveals that the defendant‘s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536 [1993]; People v Hollingsworth, 74 AD3d 1359 [2010]). Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hardee
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 3, 2011
Citations: 84 A.D.3d 835; 922 N.Y.S.2d 785
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In