History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Hancock
328 Mich. 143
Mich.
1950
Check Treatment

Rehearing

On Rehearing.

Sharpe, J.

Judgment of conviction was affirmed in this case on January 9, 1950 (326 Mich 471). The Court divided 3 to 2 with Justices Carr, Butzel and Dethmers not participating in the decision. Re*144hearing was granted by virtue of the authority contained in CL 1948, § 601.5 (Stat Ann § 27.25), and the appeal was resubmitted and oral arguments had.

Upon rehearing I am convinced for the reasons expressed in my former opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Boyles, C. J., and North, J., concurred with Sharpe, J.





Dissenting Opinion

Bushnell, J.

(dissenting). For the reasons stated in People v. Omacht, post, 145, I am unable to agree with the conclusion reached by Mr. Justice Sharpe.

The conviction should be set aside and a new trial granted.

Reid, J., concurred with Bushnell, J. Dethmers, Butzel, and Carr, JJ., did not sit.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hancock
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 9, 1950
Citation: 328 Mich. 143
Docket Number: Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 42,918
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.