In the Matter of YOLANDA CARRERAS-NEGRON, Appellant, v RAFAEL DIAZ GUTIERREZ, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York
September 16, 2004
[791 NYS2d 825]
Petitioner, as the subsequent purchaser, was on notice of the judgment debtor‘s sale of the property, despite the apparent difference in the given names of the seller and judgment debtor (see H. R. & C. Co., Inc. v Smith, 242 NY 267 [1926]). Although not addressed by the IAS court, we note that allegations regarding the sham nature of petitioner‘s purchase were unrebutted, despite her opportunity to do so. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Friedman and Sullivan, JJ.
