History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Hall
89 Misc. 2d 836
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1977
Check Treatment

Memorandum. Judgments of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial ordered.

In light of the concession of the People, and after reviewing the record on appeal, we are of the opinion that the absence of judicial supervision in unsealing the tapes of the recorded conversations before the Grand Jury rendered said tapes inadmissible in evidence (People v Sher, 38 NY2d 600, 603-605). We also find that the procedure then in use to preserve *837the sanctity and integrity of the tapes was grossly inadequate in that no log was kept as to the movement of the tapes and that the tapes themselves were not sealed in such a way so that a breaking of the seal could be detected.

Concur — Farley, P.J., Pittoni and Silberman, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hall
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 7, 1977
Citation: 89 Misc. 2d 836
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.