THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v GERALD HALL, Appellant.
First Department, Supreme Court of the State of New York
November 1, 2005
[802 NYS2d 691]
Gregory Carro, J.
Defendant‘s suppression motion was properly denied. The evidence establishes that the police had reasonable suspicion justifying their seizure of defendant, who met a detailed description of a man carrying a gun. The information the police relied on came from a source that was not anonymous, but rather had identifying characteristics that rendered it reliable, including a partial name and callback number (see People v Herold, 282 AD2d 1, 5-6 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 682 [2001]; compare Florida v J.L., 529 US 266 [2000]). Furthermore, this information was corroborated by defendant‘s conduct, which was suggestive of criminality. When the officer confronted defendant in a store, defendant turned toward the officer while moving his hand toward his waistband (see People v Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267, 270-271 [1980]; People v Jenkins, 292 AD2d 188 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 711 [2002]). Accordingly, the officer lawfully grabbed defendant‘s hand as a self-protective measure,
