History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Hall
19 Cal. 425
Cal.
1861
Check Treatment
Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

This was a case for altering the brand of a horse with intent to steal it.

*426The indictment charges the property as that of an estate. This is insufficient. The charge should be of altering the brand of the animal as that of a particular individual, or that the owner of the animal was unknown.

For this error the judgment must be reversed and cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hall
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1861
Citation: 19 Cal. 425
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.