midpage

People v. HallPeople v. Hall

California Supreme Court
Jul 1, 1861
Reporters:
Before:
Baldwin
Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

This was a case for altering the brand of a horse with intent to steal it.

*426The indictment charges the property as that of an estate. This is insufficient. The charge should be of altering the brand of the animal as that of a particular individual, or that the owner of the animal was unknown.

For this error the judgment must be reversed and cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hall
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1861
Citation: 19 Cal. 425
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
Log In