midpage

People v. GurleyPeople v. Gurley

New York Court of Appeals
Oct 18, 1977
Versions:42 N.Y.2d 1086
369 N.E.2d 1183
399 N.Y.S.2d 650
1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2420

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

*1087Defendant’s present claim of error regarding the trial court’s charge and that certain evidence was improperly received in evidence is unavailing. It is manifest that no alleged errors were preserved for our review by either exception or proper objection. His failure to take appropriate exception or to request further clarification at a time "when the court had an opportunity of effectively changing” any instruction preserved no question of law in connection therewith reviewable by this court (CPL 470.05, subd 2; People v Robinson, 36 NY2d 224, 228-229; People v Kibbe, 35 NY2d 407, 413-414). We have examined defendant’s other arguments which we find to be without merit.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Gurley
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 18, 1977
Citations: 42 N.Y.2d 1086; 369 N.E.2d 1183; 399 N.Y.S.2d 650; 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2420
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In