History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Gumbs
778 N.Y.S.2d 892
N.Y. App. Div.
2004
Check Treatment

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mullin, J.), rendered May 18, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of robbery in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Gumbs
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 28, 2004
Citation: 778 N.Y.S.2d 892
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.