Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), rendered December 1, 2003, convict
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s claim that the prosecution engaged in misconduct during cross-examination and on summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Tonge, 93 NY2d 838 [1999]; People v Pearson, 29 AD3d 711 [2006]; People v Aponte, 28 AD3d 672 [2006]).
In any event, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see People v Hernandez, 248 AD2d 727 [1998]; People v Palmer, 222 AD2d 532, 533 [1995]; People v Douglas, 149 AD2d 613 [1989]). Florio, J.P, Skelos, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.