People v. GrestyPeople v. Gresty
Judgment unani
The court determined that the People failed to establish that the confidential informant was reliable and that the observation of the activities of defendant did not clearly demonstrate criminal activity. Nevertheless, the court properly determined that the observation by the police officers of the equivocal behavior of defendant was sufficient, in conjunction with the informant’s tip, to provide the officers with an objective credible reason to request information, concerning his identity (see, People v Hollman,