People v. GreenPeople v. Green
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports County Court’s determination that defendant violated the conditions of his probation by leaving Ontario County without permission, failing to maintain steady employment, and failing to notify his probation officer immediately that he had been arrested for driving while intoxicated. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the violations were sufficiently serious to warrant the revocation of probation and imprisonment (see, People v Burton,
The contention of defendant that he was denied the right to call certain witnesses “is not supported by the record, and we will not consider matters outside the record” (People v Jones,
The court did not err in denying defendant’s request for substitution of counsel at sentencing. “[D]efendant failed to demonstrate a compelling reason for the substitution or that the substitution was not merely a dilatory tactic” (People v Jones, supra, at 905). The timing of defendant’s perfunctory request, made seconds before the court pronounced sentence, “strongly suggests that it was a delaying tactic” (People v Turner,
Finally, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Violation of Probation.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.