People v. GravlinPeople v. Gravlin
The defendant, William G. Gravlin,
*468
was arrested on September 29, 1964, and charged with murder in the first degree.
On appeal defendant contends that he should have been given credit against his sentence for the time spent in jail and in custody at Ionia State Hospital prior to his sentence. We agree.
The statute in effect at the time of defendant’s commitment to Ionia (
"Time spent in custody under subsections (3), (5), (6), (7) and (8) shall be credited against any sentence imposed on the defendant in the pending criminal case or in any other case arising from the same transaction. The statute of limitations on the pending criminal charge or any other charge arising from the same transaction shall commence to run on the entry of an order of commitment under subsection (5) of this section and shall continue to run until and unless the committing court determines under subsection (8) that the defendant is competent to stand trial.”
Section 3 of the act states that persons presently committed to Ionia State Hospital are subject to the provisions of this 1966 amendatory act. Therefore, the time defendant spent in custody at Ionia must be credited against his sentence.
The same result is required under
*469 "Whenever any person is hereafter convicted of any crime within this state and has served any time in jail prior to sentencing because of being denied or unable to furnish bond for the offense of which he is convicted, the trial court in imposing sentence shall specifically grant credit against the sentence for such time served in jail prior to sentencing.”
This statutory provision is remedial and should be liberally construed to effectuate the statutory purpose sought to be achieved by the Legislature in its enactment.
People v Cohen,
A "jail” means a place of confinement and a mental hospital is such a place. A defendant must be given credit against his sentence for time spent in confinement pursuant to governmental authority, regardless of the place of confinement.
People v Noble,
This case is remanded to the Oakland County Circuit Court with instructions to grant the defendant credit against his sentence for the days spent in confinement since the date of his arrest.