History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Gomez
685 N.Y.S.2d 448
N.Y. App. Div.
1998
Check Treatment

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sampson, J.), rendered February 21, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the second degree (four counts), burglary in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court erred when it excluded two nondisruptive children from the courtroom, one of whom was apparently the defendant’s, only because it was the court’s policy to exclude children from the courtroom, thereby denying the defendant his right to a public trial (see, People v Miller, 224 AD2d 639). His conviction must therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the *590defendant’s remaining contentions. Copertino, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Gomez
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 28, 1998
Citation: 685 N.Y.S.2d 448
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In