History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Goforth
995 N.Y.S.2d 431
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2014
|
Check Treatment

Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Mark H. Dadd, J.), rendered June 10, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [1]). By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his contention that County Court should have dismissed the indictment because the prosecutor failed to introduce exculpatory evidence before the grand jury (see People v Crumpler, 70 AD3d 1396, 1397 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 839 [2010]). Defendant’s further contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel “does not survive his plea of guilty inasmuch as ‘[t]here is no showing that the plea bargaining process was infected by any allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of his attorney[’s] allegedly poor performance’ ” (People v Fomby, 42 AD3d 894, 895 [2007]; see People v Jackson, 99 AD3d 1240, 1240 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 987 [2012]).

Present — Scudder, P.J., Fahey, Carni, Lindley and Valentino, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Goforth
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 14, 2014
Citation: 995 N.Y.S.2d 431
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.