People v. GibbsPeople v. Gibbs
The failure of the County Court to advise the defendant, at the time of the plea, that his sentence would include a period of postrelease supervision requires reversal of the judgment of conviction (see People v Hill, 9 NY3d 189, 191-192 [2007]; People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 544-545 [2007]; People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245 [2005]). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment, vacate the plea, and remit the matter to the County Court, Orange County, for further proceedings (see People v Borrego, 59 AD3d 456 [2009]; People v Stewart, 57 AD3d 581 [2008]; People v Kirksey, 56 AD3d 573 [2008]; People v Bernard, 53 AD3d 586, 586-587 [2008]; People v Cook, 49 AD3d 777, 777-778 [2008]; People v Lipscombe, 49 AD3d 781, 782 [2008]; People v Thompson, 47 AD3d 648 [2008]).
The defendant‘s remaining contentions are without merit.
Mastro, J.P., Covello, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.