People v. GarnerPeople v. Garner
We find no merit to defendant‘s sole claim that the sentence impоsed by County Court is harsh and excessive. Defendant has a lengthy criminal record characterized by alcohol-related offenses and was provided numerous оpportunities to seriously address his addiсtion before County Court resentenced him to prison. On the record before us, we find no abuse of discretion or extraоrdinary circumstances warranting a reduсtion of the sentence in the interest of justice (see e.g. People v Spriggs, 8 AD3d 833 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 681 [2004]; People v Smith, 301 AD2d 744, 745 [2003]).
Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.