People v. Garcia-ColladoPeople v. Garcia-Collado
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the County Court violated its sentencing promise by adding a component to the sentence that was not part of the plea agreement. The defendant, however, did not object to the added component of the sentence when the sentence was imposed, and thus, his claim is not preserved for appellate review (see People v Sirabella, 148 AD3d 1186, 1186 [2017]; People v Thompson, 105 AD3d 1067, 1067 [2013]; People v Marinaro, 45 AD3d 867, 868 [2007]). Under the particular circumstances of this case, we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to review the unpreserved claim.
Balkin, J.P., Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.