People v. Garcia
238 A.D.2d 605
N.Y. App. Div.1997Check Treatment—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying him a for-cause challenge to a prospective juror (see, CPL 270.20 [1] [b]; People v Williams, 63 NY2d 882; People v Hernandez, 222 AD2d 696). Nor was the defendant’s sentence excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
