People v. GagotPeople v. Gagot
Defendant‘s testimony on direct examination that he had been a victim of a crime and that he therefore carried a weapon for his own protection clearly opened the door to cross-examination about his gang affiliation (see People v Melendez, 55 NY2d 445, 451-452 [1982]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Catterson and Renwick, JJ.