midpage

People v. FurlongPeople v. Furlong

New York Court of Appeals
Oct 6, 1987
Versions:

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. The legal issue raised has been rendered academic by amendment of the regulation to require' proof of intent to consume (cf., People v Lee, 58 NY2d 491).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Furlong
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 6, 1987
Citations: 70 N.Y.2d 756; 514 N.E.2d 1373; 520 N.Y.S.2d 749; 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18872
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In