midpage

People v. FurlongPeople v. Furlong

New York Court of Appeals
Oct 6, 1987
Versions:70 N.Y.2d 756
514 N.E.2d 1373
520 N.Y.S.2d 749
1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18872

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. The legal issue raised has been rendered academic by amendment of the regulation to require' proof of intent to consume (cf., People v Lee, 58 NY2d 491).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Furlong
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 6, 1987
Citations: 70 N.Y.2d 756; 514 N.E.2d 1373; 520 N.Y.S.2d 749; 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18872
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In