People v. FortePeople v. Forte
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant challenges two orders of protection issued at the time of sentencing, contending that the County Court failed to specify the persons to whom the orders of protection applied.
The defendant‘s contention concerning the two orders of protection issued at the time of sentencing survives his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Bernardini, 142 AD3d 671, 672 [2016]; People v Kumar, 127 AD3d 882, 883 [2015]). However, this contention is unpreserved for appellate
The record indicates that the County Court named the persons to whom the orders of protection applied. Moreover, in open court, the defendant signed and was personally served with the orders of protection, each of which specifically set forth the name of the protected person. Rivera, J.P., Cohen, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.