People v. FloresPeople v. Flores
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Between March 2010 and November 2010, the defendant al
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see
The defendant’s claims regarding the integrity of the grand jury proceedings, and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in connection with the grand jury proceedings, are based upon matters dehors the record and cannot be reviewed on this direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (see People v English, 119 AD3d 706 [2014]; People v Redmond, 41 AD3d 514, 515-516 [2007]; People v Palmer, 29 AD3d 606 [2006]; People v Sain, 261 AD2d 488 [1999]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Cohen, JJ., concur.