THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MATTHEW FINIZIO, Appellant.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
954 NYS2d 636
Meyer, J.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Meyer, J.), dated May 6, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The only points challenged by the defendant before the Supreme Court, and the only points he challenges here, are the 15 points assessed under risk factor 11, based on a history of drug or alcohol abuse. Contrary to the defendant‘s contentions, the People established the facts supporting the assessment of these points by clear and convincing evidence. According to the pre-sentence report, the defendant reported use of controlled substances and/or alcohol, although he claimed at that time that he had been drug-free for more than five years. He first used marijuana or hashish before the age of 16. According to the case summary, the defendant admitted to using marijuana. When the defendant was processed by what is now the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, he scored in the “Strong Suggestion” range on the Michigan Alcohol Screening Test, and in the “Substance Abuse Indicated” range on the Simple Screening Instrument. The defendant was referred to a substance abuse treatment program. He also completed a sex offender program designed for chemically dependent inmates. In addition, the case summary establishes that the defendant has been convicted of, among other things, attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (see
Based on the foregoing, the People established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the assessment of 15 points on the Risk Assessment Instrument for a history of drug or alcohol abuse was appropriate.
Accordingly, based on the points assessed, the Supreme Court
Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
