THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v RODNEY J. FERRER, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York
January 23, 2014
978 N.Y.S.2d 476
Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of robbery in
Testifying on his own behalf, defendant offered a different version of events, claiming that he was essentially an innocent bystander during a fight between the victim and another man over a soured drug deal. Defendant claimed that the victim lost his shirt when it was torn from him during the fight. As for the cell phone, defendant testified that the victim dropped it on the ground during the fight, the other man retrieved it, and defendant purchased it from that man. Given that the verdict turned on the comparative credibility of the victim and defendant, a different verdict would not have been unreasonable; however, upon reviewing the evidence in a neutral light and according deference to the jury‘s ability to observe the witnesses and assess their credibility, we conclude that the verdict is not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]; People v Olson, 110 AD3d 1373, 1374 [2013]).
Peters, P.J., Rose and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
