THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v ADAM GOLDSMITH, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
897 NYS2d 879
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant‘s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of stalking in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see
Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see
The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 687 [1984]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83 [1982]). Rivera, J.P., Florio, Miller and Eng, JJ., concur.
