People v. FelixPeople v. Felix
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in removing the defendant from the courtroom for a relatively brief portion of the trial after an angry outburst. He repeatedly requested to leave the courtroom, and unequivocally told the court that if he remained he would not comply with its directions (see People v Parker,
The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.