midpage

People v. FecuPeople v. Fecu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 28, 2009
Versions:61 A.D.3d 991
876 N.Y.S.2d 899

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant‘s challenge to the validity of his plea of guilty is not preserved for appellate review because he did not move to withdraw the plea (see People v Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 906 [1999]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]). In any event, his contentions are without merit (see People v Akhtar, 13 AD3d 383, 383-384 [2004]; cf. Innes v Dalsheim, 864 F2d 974 [1988], cert denied 493 US 809 [1989]). Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Fecu
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 28, 2009
Citations: 61 A.D.3d 991; 876 N.Y.S.2d 899
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In