History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Fanning
300 N.Y. 593
NY
1949
Check Treatment

The defendant's petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and BROMLEY, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Fanning
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 29, 1949
Citation: 300 N.Y. 593
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.