People v. EvansPeople v. Evans
Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, including his right to appeal from his conviction after trial (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10-11 [1989]; People v Thacker, 47 AD3d 423 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 817 [2008]). During the colloquy, the court explained in detail the appellate rights that defendant was waiving, including his right to raise issues relating to his trial. The court was not required to enumerate all possible trial issues (cf. People v Roulette, 55 AD3d 394 [2008]). Before making the waiver, defendant extensively consulted with counsel, who, on the present record, is presumed to have discussed potential appellate claims with his client. No coercion or concealment of trial issues can be found on this record (see People v Holman, 89 NY2d 876 [1996]). Plainly, defendant received a substantial benefit in return for his waiver, since he significantly