midpage

People v. EsquilinPeople v. Esquilin

New York Court of Appeals
Feb 11, 1998
Versions:91 N.Y.2d 902
691 N.E.2d 1024
668 N.Y.S.2d 1000
1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

As there was evidence to support the lower courts’ determination that the police possessed a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity justifying the pursuit of defendant (see, People v Sierra, 83 NY2d 928), the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.

Defendant’s remaining contention that the trial court violated CPL 310.30 by failing to properly respond to a jury question is without merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Esquilin
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 11, 1998
Citations: 91 N.Y.2d 902; 691 N.E.2d 1024; 668 N.Y.S.2d 1000; 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In