People v. EdwardsPeople v. Edwards
Judgment,
Defendant’s suppression motions were properly denied in their entirety. The police observed defendant, who fit the description of one of the perpetrators of a robbery, pulling what appeared to be a gun from his waistband and fleeing upon making eye contact with an officer, and were thus provided with probable cause for defendant’s arrest (People v De Bour,
The court’s appropriately balanced Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Couvertier,
The record supports the court’s determination, made following extended inquiry, that defendant’s application for substitution of assigned counsel was without good cause and was simply a ploy to delay the trial. The record further establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel (People v Baldi,
We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Tom and Lerner, JJ.