People v. EdwardsPeople v. Edwards
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s argument that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him is without merit. Information provided by a victim of the burglary was sufficient to support a reasonable belief that a burglary had been committed and that defendant and his wife were the perpetrators (see, People v Johnson,
Contrary to defendant’s assertions, statements he made to his wife were not protected by the marital privilege. "Not protective of all communications, the privilege attaches only to those statements made in confidence and 'that are induced by the marital relation and prompted by the affection, confidence and loyalty engendered by such relationship’ ” (Matter of Vanderbilt [Rosner — Hickey],
Defendant’s other contentions on appeal are either unpreserved or without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Steuben County Court, Finnerty, J. — burglary, second degree; petit larceny, four counts.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.