History
  • No items yet
midpage
236 A.D.2d 484
N.Y. App. Div.
1997

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Grajales, J.), rendered October 14, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

While there is a potential burden-shifting effect to an admonition, delivered in the presence of the jury, that a defense opening statement be confined to matters that the defense intends to "prove”, the court’s admonition in this case did not constitute reversible error (see, People v Fabian, 213 AD2d 298, 298-299; People v Rodriguez, 211 AD2d 443; People v Robinson, 202 AD2d 225, 225-226). Under the circumstances of this case, "there is no realistic view that the court’s remarks could be interpreted so as to skew the burden of proof’ (People v Concepcion, 228 AD2d 204, 206). Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Dukes
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 10, 1997
Citations: 236 A.D.2d 484; 654 N.Y.S.2d 605; 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1174
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In