midpage

People v. DuffyPeople v. Duffy

New York Court of Appeals
May 8, 1975
Versions:36 N.Y.2d 857
331 N.E.2d 695
370 N.Y.S.2d 919
1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1903

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the defendant’s constitutional rights were violated by the prosecutor’s cross-examination concerning the particulars of his previous drug use and possession. The Court of Appeals considered that *858contention and found no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 36 NY2d 258.]

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Duffy
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 8, 1975
Citations: 36 N.Y.2d 857; 331 N.E.2d 695; 370 N.Y.S.2d 919; 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1903
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In