People v. Donaldson

Dec 22, 2006
Reporters:
,

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]) and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (§ 165.45 [5]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, Supreme Court properly refused to suppress the evidence seized by the police after they stopped the stolen vehicle in which he was riding. The record does not support defendant‘s contention that the court should have suppressed the evidence because the stop of the vehicle was a pretext to investigate a possible drug transaction. The arresting officer testified at the suppression hearing that he observed the vehicle exceed the speed limit by 10 to 15 miles per hour and, “where a police officer has probable cause to detain a person temporarily for a traffic violation, that seizure does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution even though the underlying reason for the stop might have been to investigate some other matter” (People v Robinson, 97 NY2d 341, 348 [2001]; see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]). Contrary to defendant‘s further contention, the testimony of the arresting officer at the suppression hearing was not incredible as a matter of law (see generally People v Hopkins, 244 AD2d 357, 358 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 874 [1997]; People v Jordan, 242 AD2d 254, 255 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 875 [1997]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Centra and Pine, JJ.