History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. DiSimone
298 A.D.2d 399
N.Y. App. Div.
2002
Check Treatment

Appeal by the *400defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered January 26, 2001, convicting him of murder in the second degree and tampering with physical evidence (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, reversal is not required based on a Brady violation (see Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83). At a minimum, the information was disclosed to the defendant in time to give him a meaningful opportunity to use it (see People v Cortijo, 70 NY2d 868, 870; People v Ahmed, 244 AD2d 415).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85-86).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit or do not require reversal. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. DiSimone
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 7, 2002
Citation: 298 A.D.2d 399
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.