The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Dingle, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
912 NYS2d 421
Skelos, J.P., Eng, Hall and Lott, JJ.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of special circumstances warranting a downward departure from his presumptive level three risk assessment (see People v Colavito, 73 AD3d 1004, 1005 [2010]; People v Bowens, 55 AD3d 809, 810 [2008]; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating the defendant a level three sex offender.
Skelos, J.P., Eng, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
