midpage

People v. DickinsonPeople v. Dickinson

New York Court of Appeals
Dec 15, 2011
235
Versions:

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

It is undisputed that the People were not ready for trial within six months of the commencement of the action, as CPL 30.30 (1) (a) requires, even after application of the exclusions listed in CPL 30.30 (4). The People’s only claim is that defendant waived his rights under CPL 30.30 by participating in plea negotiations for several months.

While a defendant may waive rights under CPL 30.30 (People v Waldron, 6 NY3d 463 [2006]), the record here contains no evidence of any waiver, written or oral. Mere silence is not a waiver. We repeat our observation in Waldron that “prosecutors would be well advised to obtain unambiguous written waivers in situations like these” (id. at 468).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Dickinson
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 15, 2011
Citations: 18 N.Y.3d 835; 962 N.E.2d 257; 938 N.Y.S.2d 836; 2011 NY Slip Op 9001; 235
Docket Number: 235
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In