midpage

People v. DickensPeople v. Dickens

New York Court of Appeals
Oct 10, 1996
Versions:88 N.Y.2d 1031
673 N.E.2d 1237
651 N.Y.S.2d 10
1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3054

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The grounds defendant now advances for challenging the *1033lawfulness of the search were not presented to the trial court. We therefore conclude that defendant failed to preserve his present claims for this Court’s review.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Dickens
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 10, 1996
Citations: 88 N.Y.2d 1031; 673 N.E.2d 1237; 651 N.Y.S.2d 10; 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3054
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In